0bf9079d44
Summary: This should give us some performance benefit calling native C++ code. Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/4786 See https://github.com/evolvedbinary/jni-benchmarks/ for more info. Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/11882 Reviewed By: pdillinger Differential Revision: D53066207 Pulled By: ajkr fbshipit-source-id: daedef185215d0d8e791cd85bef598900bcb5bf2
30 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
30 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the
|
|
// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License
|
|
// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory).
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements the "bridge" between Java and C++ for
|
|
// JNI Callbacks from C++ to sub-classes or org.rocksdb.RocksCallbackObject
|
|
|
|
#include <jni.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "include/org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject.h"
|
|
#include "jnicallback.h"
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Class: org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject
|
|
* Method: disposeInternal
|
|
* Signature: (J)V
|
|
*/
|
|
void Java_org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject_disposeInternal(JNIEnv* /*env*/,
|
|
jclass /*jcls*/,
|
|
jlong handle) {
|
|
// TODO(AR) is deleting from the super class JniCallback OK, or must we delete
|
|
// the subclass? Example hierarchies:
|
|
// 1) Comparator -> BaseComparatorJniCallback + JniCallback ->
|
|
// DirectComparatorJniCallback 2) Comparator -> BaseComparatorJniCallback +
|
|
// JniCallback -> ComparatorJniCallback
|
|
// I think this is okay, as Comparator and JniCallback both have virtual
|
|
// destructors...
|
|
delete reinterpret_cast<ROCKSDB_NAMESPACE::JniCallback*>(handle);
|
|
}
|