fix: Apply client-requested timeout to federated key queries #1261

Merged
Jade merged 4 commits from nex/fix/key-query into main 2026-01-03 17:13:55 +00:00
Owner

Also parallelised federation calls in related functions.

Ran pre-commit which will also make main green again.

Pull request checklist:

  • This pull request targets the main branch, and the branch is named something other than
    main.
  • I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear.
  • I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request.
  • I have followed the contributing guidelines:
Also parallelised federation calls in related functions. Ran pre-commit which will also make main green again. <!-- In order to help reviewers know what your pull request does at a glance, you should ensure that 1. Your PR title is a short, single sentence describing what you changed 2. You have described in more detail what you have changed, why you have changed it, what the intended effect is, and why you think this will be beneficial to the project. If you have made any potentially strange/questionable design choices, but didn't feel they'd benefit from code comments, please don't mention them here - after opening your pull request, go to "files changed", and click on the "+" symbol in the line number gutter, and attach comments to the lines that you think would benefit from some clarification. --> <!-- Example: This pull request allows us to warp through time and space ten times faster than before by double-inverting the warp drive with hyperheated jump fluid, both making the drive faster and more efficient. This resolves the common issue where we have to wait more than 10 milliseconds to engage, use, and disengage the warp drive when travelling between galaxies. --> <!-- Closes: #... --> <!-- Fixes: #... --> <!-- Uncomment the above line(s) if your pull request fixes an issue or closes another pull request by superseding it. Replace `#...` with the issue/pr number, such as `#123`. --> **Pull request checklist:** <!-- You need to complete these before your PR can be considered. If you aren't sure about some, feel free to ask for clarification in #dev:continuwuity.org. --> - [x] This pull request targets the `main` branch, and the branch is named something other than `main`. - [x] I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear. - [x] I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request. - I have followed the [contributing guidelines][c1]: - [x] My contribution follows the [code style][c2], if applicable. - [x] I ran [pre-commit checks][c1pc] before opening/drafting this pull request. - [x] I have [tested my contribution][c1t] (or proof-read it for documentation-only changes) myself, if applicable. This includes ensuring code compiles. - [x] My commit messages follow the [commit message format][c1cm] and are descriptive. - [x] I have written a [news fragment][n1] for this PR, if applicable<!--(can be done after hitting open!)-->. <!-- Notes on these requirements: - While not required, we encourage you to sign your commits with GPG or SSH to attest the authenticity of your changes. - While we allow LLM-assisted contributions, we do not appreciate contributions that are low quality, which is typical of machine-generated contributions that have not had a lot of love and care from a human. Please do not open a PR if all you have done is asked ChatGPT to tidy up the codebase with a +-100,000 diff. - In the case of code style violations, reviewers may leave review comments/change requests indicating what the ideal change would look like. For example, a reviewer may suggest you lower a log level, or use `match` instead of `if/else` etc. - In the case of code style violations, pre-commit check failures, minor things like typos/spelling errors, and in some cases commit format violations, reviewers may modify your branch directly, typically by making changes and adding a commit. Particularly in the latter case, a reviewer may rebase your commits to squash "spammy" ones (like "fix", "fix", "actually fix"), and reword commit messages that don't satisfy the format. - Pull requests MUST pass the `Checks` CI workflows to be capable of being merged. This can only be bypassed in exceptional circumstances. If your CI flakes, let us know in matrix:r/dev:continuwuity.org. - Pull requests have to be based on the latest `main` commit before being merged. If the main branch changes while you're making your changes, you should make sure you rebase on main before opening a PR. Your branch will be rebased on main before it is merged if it has fallen behind. - We typically only do fast-forward merges, so your entire commit log will be included. Once in main, it's difficult to get out cleanly, so put on your best dress, smile for the cameras! --> [c1]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md [c2]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/docs/development/code_style.mdx [c1pc]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pre-commit-checks [c1t]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-tests-locally [c1cm]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages [n1]: https://towncrier.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorial.html#creating-news-fragments
fix: Apply client-requested timeout to federated key queries
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 2m12s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
bc426e1bfc
Also parallelised federation calls in related functions
nex added this to the 0.5.2 milestone 2026-01-03 16:06:41 +00:00
style: Include errors in key claim response too
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 2m37s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
56d7099011
@ -532,2 +552,3 @@
Some((server, response))
})
.collect();
.then(async |v| v)
Owner

Why the empty closure?

Why the empty closure?
Author
Owner

good question

good question
nex marked this conversation as resolved
style: Remove unnecessary then() calls in chain
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m57s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Failing after 18m12s
1c7bd2f6fa
nex requested review from Owners 2026-01-03 16:24:05 +00:00
@ -522,17 +540,22 @@ where
let request =
federation::keys::get_keys::v1::Request { device_keys: device_keys_input_fed };
let response = tokio::time::timeout_at(
Owner

This does have the slight problem of if WIDTH futures hang at the same time and you still have requests remaining you end up with requests with no deadline, so probably having a min and max deadline would be a good idea - although having a min deadline would mean it's possible to overrun the timeout 🤷

This does have the slight problem of if [WIDTH](https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/commit/d8311a5ff672fdc4729d956af5e3af8646b0670d/src/core/utils/stream/band.rs#L4) futures hang at the same time and you still have requests remaining you end up with requests with no deadline, so probably having a min and max deadline would be a good idea - although having a min deadline would mean it's possible to overrun the timeout 🤷
Owner

Pretty sure WIDTH gets set based on the CPU too

Pretty sure WIDTH gets set based on the CPU too
Author
Owner

ugh people should just run faster servers /j

good catch

ugh people should just run faster servers /j good catch
nex marked this conversation as resolved
fix: Use a timeout instead of deadline
All checks were successful
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m58s
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (push) Successful in 1m46s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (push) Successful in 5m2s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (release) (push) Successful in 18m30s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (release) (push) Successful in 17m0s
Release Docker Image / Create Multi-arch Release Manifest (push) Successful in 22s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 34m49s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (push) Successful in 36m30s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (max-perf) (push) Successful in 17m51s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (max-perf) (push) Successful in 17m30s
Release Docker Image / Create Max-Perf Manifest (push) Successful in 18s
27d6604d14
Jade approved these changes 2026-01-03 17:13:18 +00:00
Jade left a comment
Owner
[LGTM](https://matrix.to/#/!ksTlboXVgcyWjv5GrlEeKyQuJ8ZCprnwQx2b6-BQ44Q/%24th3esdq2SGD-eZ3VZUM-_arQH_cjcIE47Y6gxNkgsqQ?via=ellis.link&via=explodie.org&via=gingershaped.computer)
Jade merged commit 27d6604d14 into main 2026-01-03 17:13:55 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
continuwuation/continuwuity!1261
No description provided.