Return 404 instead of 500 when client tries to join non-existent room #1579

Manually merged
nex merged 43 commits from ezera/continuwuity:main into main 2026-04-01 17:41:23 +00:00
Contributor

This pull request changes the error returned by the server when the user attempts to join a non-existent room (see #1443). Previously, the server returned error 500. Now, we return error 404, with a generic error message, which is closer to what Synapse does (as stated in #1443).

I considered returning

403 M_UNKNOWN or other generic message (prevent malicious users to enumerate room ids this way)

because I agree that it would make sense to prevent someone from enumerating which rooms exist. However, I settled on 404, because I thought it would make sense to mimic Synapse for the sake of client compatibility. Please let me know if you disagree.

I also defined a new err! macro arm. I wasn't sure that was the best idea, but there didn't seem to be an existing arm that fit for returning this kind of error.

I ran the tests locally, and everything passed, but I haven't added a test for this specific case.

Fixes: #1443

Pull request checklist:

  • This pull request targets the main branch, and the branch is named something other than
    main.
  • I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear.
  • I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request.
  • I have followed the contributing guidelines:
<!-- In order to help reviewers know what your pull request does at a glance, you should ensure that 1. Your PR title is a short, single sentence describing what you changed 2. You have described in more detail what you have changed, why you have changed it, what the intended effect is, and why you think this will be beneficial to the project. If you have made any potentially strange/questionable design choices, but didn't feel they'd benefit from code comments, please don't mention them here - after opening your pull request, go to "files changed", and click on the "+" symbol in the line number gutter, and attach comments to the lines that you think would benefit from some clarification. --> This pull request changes the error returned by the server when the user attempts to join a non-existent room (see https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/issues/1443). Previously, the server returned error 500. Now, we return error 404, with a generic error message, which is closer to what Synapse does (as stated in #1443). I considered returning > 403 M_UNKNOWN or other generic message (prevent malicious users to enumerate room ids this way) because I agree that it would make sense to prevent someone from enumerating which rooms exist. However, I settled on 404, because I thought it would make sense to mimic Synapse for the sake of client compatibility. Please let me know if you disagree. I also defined a new `err!` macro arm. I wasn't sure that was the best idea, but there didn't seem to be an existing arm that fit for returning this kind of error. I ran the tests locally, and everything passed, but I haven't added a test for this specific case. <!-- Example: This pull request allows us to warp through time and space ten times faster than before by double-inverting the warp drive with hyperheated jump fluid, both making the drive faster and more efficient. This resolves the common issue where we have to wait more than 10 milliseconds to engage, use, and disengage the warp drive when travelling between galaxies. --> <!-- Closes: #... --> Fixes: #1443 <!-- Uncomment the above line(s) if your pull request fixes an issue or closes another pull request by superseding it. Replace `#...` with the issue/pr number, such as `#123`. --> **Pull request checklist:** <!-- You need to complete these before your PR can be considered. If you aren't sure about some, feel free to ask for clarification in #dev:continuwuity.org. --> - [x] This pull request targets the `main` branch, and the branch is named something other than `main`. - [x] I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear. - [x] I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request. - I have followed the [contributing guidelines][c1]: - [x] My contribution follows the [code style][c2], if applicable. - [x] I ran [pre-commit checks][c1pc] before opening/drafting this pull request. - [x] I have [tested my contribution][c1t] (or proof-read it for documentation-only changes) myself, if applicable. This includes ensuring code compiles. - [x] My commit messages follow the [commit message format][c1cm] and are descriptive. - [ ] I have written a [news fragment][n1] for this PR, if applicable<!--(can be done after hitting open!)-->. <!-- Notes on these requirements: - While not required, we encourage you to sign your commits with GPG or SSH to attest the authenticity of your changes. - While we allow LLM-assisted contributions, we do not appreciate contributions that are low quality, which is typical of machine-generated contributions that have not had a lot of love and care from a human. Please do not open a PR if all you have done is asked ChatGPT to tidy up the codebase with a +-100,000 diff. - In the case of code style violations, reviewers may leave review comments/change requests indicating what the ideal change would look like. For example, a reviewer may suggest you lower a log level, or use `match` instead of `if/else` etc. - In the case of code style violations, pre-commit check failures, minor things like typos/spelling errors, and in some cases commit format violations, reviewers may modify your branch directly, typically by making changes and adding a commit. Particularly in the latter case, a reviewer may rebase your commits to squash "spammy" ones (like "fix", "fix", "actually fix"), and reword commit messages that don't satisfy the format. - Pull requests MUST pass the `Checks` CI workflows to be capable of being merged. This can only be bypassed in exceptional circumstances. If your CI flakes, let us know in matrix:r/dev:continuwuity.org. - Pull requests have to be based on the latest `main` commit before being merged. If the main branch changes while you're making your changes, you should make sure you rebase on main before opening a PR. Your branch will be rebased on main before it is merged if it has fallen behind. - We typically only do fast-forward merges, so your entire commit log will be included. Once in main, it's difficult to get out cleanly, so put on your best dress, smile for the cameras! --> [c1]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md [c2]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/docs/development/code_style.mdx [c1pc]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pre-commit-checks [c1t]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-tests-locally [c1cm]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages [n1]: https://towncrier.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorial.html#creating-news-fragments
nex requested changes 2026-03-27 00:23:40 +00:00
@ -786,3 +786,3 @@
if servers.is_empty() || servers.len() == 1 && services.globals.server_is_ours(&servers[0]) {
return Err(error);
return Err!(Request(Unknown("Unknown error"), NOT_FOUND));
Owner

This masks Forbidden errors such as "not invited to room" and incorrectly returns 404 not found instead of 403 forbidden etc, which may (and will in future) hide important details from the end user. 404/M_UNKNOWN should only be returned if we genuinely don't know the room exists

This masks Forbidden errors such as "not invited to room" and incorrectly returns 404 not found instead of 403 forbidden etc, which may (and will in future) hide important details from the end user. 404/M_UNKNOWN should only be returned if we genuinely don't know the room exists
Author
Contributor

Thanks! Does the new code match the behaviour you would expect?

Thanks! Does the new code match the behaviour you would expect?
ezera changed title from Return 404 instead of 500 when client tries to join non-existent room to WIP: Return 404 instead of 500 when client tries to join non-existent room 2026-03-27 00:47:31 +00:00
ezera force-pushed main from 2344e04107
All checks were successful
Check Changelog / Check for changelog (pull_request_target) Successful in 11s
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 3m14s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 21m45s
to f740be422d
Some checks are pending
Check Changelog / Check for changelog (pull_request_target) Waiting to run
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 19m52s
2026-03-27 01:29:01 +00:00
Compare
ezera changed title from WIP: Return 404 instead of 500 when client tries to join non-existent room to Return 404 instead of 500 when client tries to join non-existent room 2026-03-27 01:31:21 +00:00
ezera requested review from nex 2026-03-27 01:44:20 +00:00
nex self-assigned this 2026-03-29 16:48:20 +00:00
nex requested changes 2026-04-01 16:20:58 +00:00
nex left a comment
Owner

Looks good now, I just think the wording of the 404 could be improved

Looks good now, I just think the wording of the 404 could be improved
@ -786,2 +786,4 @@
if servers.is_empty() || servers.len() == 1 && services.globals.server_is_ours(&servers[0]) {
if !services.rooms.metadata.exists(room_id).await {
return Err!(Request(Unknown("Unknown error"), NOT_FOUND));
Owner

I think since we now know that we just don't have the room locally, an error message of Room was not found locally and no servers were found to help us discover it may be more descriptive than Unknown error (thinking about all the people who may join our support room confused by "unknown error" when joining a room via ID with no vias)

I think since we now know that we just don't have the room locally, an error message of `Room was not found locally and no servers were found to help us discover it` may be more descriptive than `Unknown error` (thinking about all the people who may join our support room confused by "unknown error" when joining a room via ID with no vias)
ezera force-pushed main from f740be422d
Some checks are pending
Check Changelog / Check for changelog (pull_request_target) Waiting to run
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 19m52s
to 0cc1e4685c
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (push) Successful in 1m19s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (push) Successful in 3m8s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (push) Successful in 13m57s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (release) (push) Successful in 14m36s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (release) (push) Successful in 11m18s
Release Docker Image / Create Multi-arch Release Manifest (push) Successful in 25s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (max-perf) (push) Failing after 36m9s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (max-perf) (push) Failing after 31m27s
Release Docker Image / Create Max-Perf Manifest (push) Has been skipped
Check Changelog / Check for changelog (pull_request_target) Successful in 9s
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 2m59s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 16m9s
2026-04-01 17:41:22 +00:00
Compare
nex manually merged commit 0cc1e4685c into main 2026-04-01 17:41:23 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
nex
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
continuwuation/continuwuity!1579
No description provided.