fix: use in-flake version of rocksdb instead of nixpkgs' upstream package #1802
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Blocked
Bug
Changelog
Added
Changelog
Missing
Changelog
None
Cherry-picking
Database
Dependencies
Dependencies/Renovate
Difficulty
Easy
Difficulty
Hard
Difficulty
Medium
Documentation
Enhancement
Good first issue
Help wanted
Inherited
Matrix/Administration
Matrix/Appservices
Matrix/Auth
Matrix/Client
Matrix/Core
Matrix/E2EE
Matrix/Federation
Matrix/Hydra
Matrix/MSC
Matrix/Media
Matrix/T&S
Merge
Merge/Manual
Merge/Squash
Meta
Meta/CI
Meta/Packaging
Priority
Blocking
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Security
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Invalid
Status
Needs Investigation
Support
Wont fix
old/ci/cd
old/rust
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
continuwuation/continuwuity!1802
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "bart/continuwuity:fix/nix-build"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Fixes #1801
cc @Henry-Hiles
Pull request checklist:
mainbranch, and the branch is named something other thanmain.myself, if applicable. This includes ensuring code compiles.
hmm, why is this needed, given https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/nix/packages/continuwuity.nix#L13?
Since callPackage pulls in the upstream version.
foo ? "default"only setsfooto the default of"default"iffoois not set.Ahh, right, that makes sense.
Builds for me ;)
@Henry-Hiles wrote in #1802 (comment):
Then can you remove this default plus the line taking in
callPackageplease? Then this is good, i think :)If you just apply this, it will be good :)
@Henry-Hiles wrote in #1802 (comment):
Doesn't matter IMHO, but I will :)
452049412bdb724b67ffSo big issue lol, this compiles right, but at least on max-perf it leads to a core-dump when actually running the server and now I can't use Matrix :p
I'll look into it.
I mean, a fresh build of this does work. I'll try using the previous database and see if it fails to migrate or something.
Still cannot reproduce a coredump. Can you provide some more info?
Oh, actually, let met try max-perf
Hmm, actually I can reproduce a
SIGSEGVnowIs that what you got also?
See #1808