fix: Properly set stripped state for local invites #1346

Merged
ginger merged 3 commits from ginger/fix-local-invites into main 2026-02-10 02:29:12 +00:00
Owner

This pull request sets stripped state in the database correctly for local invites, preventing invites by users to other users on the same homeserver from appearing broken or never showing up in clients.

Fixes !1249.

Pull request checklist:

  • This pull request targets the main branch, and the branch is named something other than
    main.
  • I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear.
  • I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request.
  • I have followed the contributing guidelines:
<!-- In order to help reviewers know what your pull request does at a glance, you should ensure that 1. Your PR title is a short, single sentence describing what you changed 2. You have described in more detail what you have changed, why you have changed it, what the intended effect is, and why you think this will be beneficial to the project. If you have made any potentially strange/questionable design choices, but didn't feel they'd benefit from code comments, please don't mention them here - after opening your pull request, go to "files changed", and click on the "+" symbol in the line number gutter, and attach comments to the lines that you think would benefit from some clarification. --> This pull request sets stripped state in the database correctly for local invites, preventing invites by users to other users on the same homeserver from appearing broken or never showing up in clients. <!-- Example: This pull request allows us to warp through time and space ten times faster than before by double-inverting the warp drive with hyperheated jump fluid, both making the drive faster and more efficient. This resolves the common issue where we have to wait more than 10 milliseconds to engage, use, and disengage the warp drive when travelling between galaxies. --> Fixes !1249. <!-- Uncomment the above line(s) if your pull request fixes an issue or closes another pull request by superseding it. Replace `#...` with the issue/pr number, such as `#123`. --> **Pull request checklist:** <!-- You need to complete these before your PR can be considered. If you aren't sure about some, feel free to ask for clarification in #dev:continuwuity.org. --> - [x] This pull request targets the `main` branch, and the branch is named something other than `main`. - [x] I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear. - [x] I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request. - I have followed the [contributing guidelines][c1]: - [x] My contribution follows the [code style][c2], if applicable. - [x] I ran [pre-commit checks][c1pc] before opening/drafting this pull request. - [x] I have [tested my contribution][c1t] (or proof-read it for documentation-only changes) myself, if applicable. This includes ensuring code compiles. - [x] My commit messages follow the [commit message format][c1cm] and are descriptive. - [x] I have written a [news fragment][n1] for this PR, if applicable<!--(can be done after hitting open!)-->. <!-- Notes on these requirements: - While not required, we encourage you to sign your commits with GPG or SSH to attest the authenticity of your changes. - While we allow LLM-assisted contributions, we do not appreciate contributions that are low quality, which is typical of machine-generated contributions that have not had a lot of love and care from a human. Please do not open a PR if all you have done is asked ChatGPT to tidy up the codebase with a +-100,000 diff. - In the case of code style violations, reviewers may leave review comments/change requests indicating what the ideal change would look like. For example, a reviewer may suggest you lower a log level, or use `match` instead of `if/else` etc. - In the case of code style violations, pre-commit check failures, minor things like typos/spelling errors, and in some cases commit format violations, reviewers may modify your branch directly, typically by making changes and adding a commit. Particularly in the latter case, a reviewer may rebase your commits to squash "spammy" ones (like "fix", "fix", "actually fix"), and reword commit messages that don't satisfy the format. - Pull requests MUST pass the `Checks` CI workflows to be capable of being merged. This can only be bypassed in exceptional circumstances. If your CI flakes, let us know in matrix:r/dev:continuwuity.org. - Pull requests have to be based on the latest `main` commit before being merged. If the main branch changes while you're making your changes, you should make sure you rebase on main before opening a PR. Your branch will be rebased on main before it is merged if it has fallen behind. - We typically only do fast-forward merges, so your entire commit log will be included. Once in main, it's difficult to get out cleanly, so put on your best dress, smile for the cameras! --> [c1]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md [c2]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/docs/development/code_style.mdx [c1pc]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pre-commit-checks [c1t]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-tests-locally [c1cm]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages [n1]: https://towncrier.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorial.html#creating-news-fragments
feat: Implement a migration to fix busted local invites
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 2m23s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 3m37s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
8add53f8ab
nex added this to the 0.5.5 milestone 2026-02-10 02:08:10 +00:00
nex requested review from nex 2026-02-10 02:08:20 +00:00
@ -724,0 +753,4 @@
// and they are actually invited to the room
&& let Ok(membership_event) = services.rooms.state_accessor.room_state_get(&room_id, &StateEventType::RoomMember, user_id.as_str()).await
&& membership_event.get_content::<RoomMemberEventContent>().is_ok_and(|content| content.membership == MembershipState::Invite)
// and the invite was sent by a local user
Owner

Why is it being sent by a local user important?

Why is it being sent by a local user important?
Author
Owner

Only invites sent by local users to local users will trigger the bug, that filter lets the migration run faster.

Only invites sent by local users to local users will trigger the bug, that filter lets the migration run faster.
ginger marked this conversation as resolved
nex approved these changes 2026-02-10 02:25:45 +00:00
chore: Formatting fixes
Some checks failed
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 2m32s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Failing after 37m44s
931b9735e9
Jade approved these changes 2026-02-10 02:28:52 +00:00
ginger merged commit b9b1ff87f2 into main 2026-02-10 02:29:12 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
continuwuation/continuwuity!1346
No description provided.