feat: admin command for mass-rejecting invites #1741

Merged
nex merged 3 commits from 31a/continuwuity:pr-admin-users-invite-commands into main 2026-05-06 17:41:17 +00:00
Contributor

this PR adds the commands users list-invited-roomsand users force-reject-invites to list and respectively reject all currently open invites for a local user

this should help with manually cleaning up invite spam which was not filtered by other mechanisms.

Pull request checklist:

  • This pull request targets the main branch, and the branch is named something other than
    main.
  • I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear.
  • I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request.
  • I have followed the contributing guidelines:
<!-- In order to help reviewers know what your pull request does at a glance, you should ensure that 1. Your PR title is a short, single sentence describing what you changed 2. You have described in more detail what you have changed, why you have changed it, what the intended effect is, and why you think this will be beneficial to the project. If you have made any potentially strange/questionable design choices, but didn't feel they'd benefit from code comments, please don't mention them here - after opening your pull request, go to "files changed", and click on the "+" symbol in the line number gutter, and attach comments to the lines that you think would benefit from some clarification. --> this PR adds the commands `users list-invited-rooms`and `users force-reject-invites` to list and respectively reject all currently open invites for a local user this should help with manually cleaning up invite spam which was not filtered by other mechanisms. <!-- Example: This pull request allows us to warp through time and space ten times faster than before by double-inverting the warp drive with hyperheated jump fluid, both making the drive faster and more efficient. This resolves the common issue where we have to wait more than 10 milliseconds to engage, use, and disengage the warp drive when travelling between galaxies. --> <!-- Closes: #... --> <!-- Fixes: #... --> <!-- Uncomment the above line(s) if your pull request fixes an issue or closes another pull request by superseding it. Replace `#...` with the issue/pr number, such as `#123`. --> **Pull request checklist:** <!-- You need to complete these before your PR can be considered. If you aren't sure about some, feel free to ask for clarification in #dev:continuwuity.org. --> - [x] This pull request targets the `main` branch, and the branch is named something other than `main`. - [x] I have written an appropriate pull request title and my description is clear. - [x] I understand I am responsible for the contents of this pull request. - I have followed the [contributing guidelines][c1]: - [x] My contribution follows the [code style][c2], if applicable. - [x] I ran [pre-commit checks][c1pc] before opening/drafting this pull request. - [x] I have [tested my contribution][c1t] (or proof-read it for documentation-only changes) myself, if applicable. This includes ensuring code compiles. - [x] My commit messages follow the [commit message format][c1cm] and are descriptive. <!-- Notes on these requirements: - While not required, we encourage you to sign your commits with GPG or SSH to attest the authenticity of your changes. - While we allow LLM-assisted contributions, we do not appreciate contributions that are low quality, which is typical of machine-generated contributions that have not had a lot of love and care from a human. Please do not open a PR if all you have done is asked ChatGPT to tidy up the codebase with a +-100,000 diff. - In the case of code style violations, reviewers may leave review comments/change requests indicating what the ideal change would look like. For example, a reviewer may suggest you lower a log level, or use `match` instead of `if/else` etc. - In the case of code style violations, pre-commit check failures, minor things like typos/spelling errors, and in some cases commit format violations, reviewers may modify your branch directly, typically by making changes and adding a commit. Particularly in the latter case, a reviewer may rebase your commits to squash "spammy" ones (like "fix", "fix", "actually fix"), and reword commit messages that don't satisfy the format. - Pull requests MUST pass the `Checks` CI workflows to be capable of being merged. This can only be bypassed in exceptional circumstances. If your CI flakes, let us know in matrix:r/dev:continuwuity.org. - Pull requests have to be based on the latest `main` commit before being merged. If the main branch changes while you're making your changes, you should make sure you rebase on main before opening a PR. Your branch will be rebased on main before it is merged if it has fallen behind. - We typically only do fast-forward merges, so your entire commit log will be included. Once in main, it's difficult to get out cleanly, so put on your best dress, smile for the cameras! --> [c1]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md [c2]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/docs/development/code_style.mdx [c1pc]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pre-commit-checks [c1t]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#running-tests-locally [c1cm]: https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#commit-messages
nex approved these changes 2026-05-06 16:43:59 +00:00
Dismissed
nex left a comment

Code looks fine to me. Don't forget the news frag. Once checks pass I'm happy to merge this :)

Code looks fine to me. Don't forget the news frag. Once checks pass I'm happy to merge this :)
@ -430,0 +487,4 @@
.filter_map(async |(room_id, _)| {
match leave_room(self.services, &user_id, &room_id, None).await {
| Err(ref e) => {
warn!(%user_id, "Failed to leave {room_id} remotely: {e}");
Owner

remotely isn't necessary here

`remotely` isn't necessary here
Owner

Actually better wording might be Failed to reject invite to {room_id}: {e}

Actually better wording might be `Failed to reject invite to {room_id}: {e}`
31a marked this conversation as resolved
@ -167,2 +173,4 @@
},
/// Manually make a user reject all current invites
ForceRejectInvites {
Owner

reject-all-invites is probably a more apt command name than force-reject-invites since it intuitively highlights that all invites are rejected

`reject-all-invites` is probably a more apt command name than `force-reject-invites` since it intuitively highlights that *all* invites are rejected
Author
Contributor

an artifact of the fact that it originally allowed specific rooms to be targeted, but then 31a decided that that is not useful enough

an artifact of the fact that it originally allowed specific rooms to be targeted, but then 31a decided that that is not useful enough
31a marked this conversation as resolved
31a force-pushed pr-admin-users-invite-commands from f9d13936d3
All checks were successful
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Check changed files (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Checks / Changelog / Check changelog is added (pull_request_target) Successful in 30s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m40s
to b296720540
All checks were successful
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Checks / Prek / Check changed files (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Checks / Changelog / Check changelog is added (pull_request_target) Successful in 9s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m5s
Checks / Prek / Check changed files (push) Successful in 6s
Documentation / Build and Deploy Documentation (push) Successful in 1m31s
Checks / Prek / Pre-commit & Formatting (push) Successful in 2m42s
Checks / Prek / Clippy and Cargo Tests (push) Successful in 9m41s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (release) (push) Successful in 12m40s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-arm64 (max-perf) (push) Has been skipped
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (release) (push) Successful in 11m30s
Release Docker Image / Create Multi-arch Release Manifest (push) Successful in 43s
Release Docker Image / Build linux-amd64 (max-perf) (push) Successful in 36m8s
Release Docker Image / Create Max-Perf Manifest (push) Has been skipped
Release Docker Image / Mirror Images (push) Has been skipped
Release Docker Image / Release Binaries (push) Has been skipped
2026-05-06 17:25:46 +00:00
Compare
31a requested review from nex 2026-05-06 17:40:13 +00:00
nex approved these changes 2026-05-06 17:41:04 +00:00
nex left a comment

lgtm, thanks!

lgtm, thanks!
nex merged commit b296720540 into main 2026-05-06 17:41:17 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
nex
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
continuwuation/continuwuity!1741
No description provided.