`ExplicitAllow` -> `Allow`

@@ -112,0 +115,4 @@
+			// Apply other layers of invite blocking first, so that user/server
+			// denies take priority over implicit allows.
+			if content.default_action != Some(InvitePermissionAction::DenyPublic)
+				&& self

@@ -112,0 +114,4 @@
+			}
+			// Apply other layers of invite blocking first, so that user/server
+			// denies take priority over implicit allows.
+			if content.default_action != Some(InvitePermissionAction::DenyPublic)

@@ -111,1 +110,3 @@
-				.user_filter_level(sender_user)
+			let content = stable.unwrap_or_else(|_| unstable.unwrap()).content;
+			let verdict = content.user_filter_level(sender_user);
+			if verdict != FilterLevel::Allow {

@@ -112,0 +122,4 @@
+				FilterLevel::Block
+			} else {
+				FilterLevel::Allow
+			}

@@ -112,3 +126,4 @@
 		}
 	}
 
+	/// Checks that sender and recipient share at least one rule that has a join

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ use wildmatch::WildMatch;
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
 pub enum FilterLevel {
 	Allow,
+	ExplicitAllow,